W.D.Va.: Defendant was not seized when officer told him to hang for a few minutes

Encounter with the police officer investigating a shooting where defendant was stopped on the street and defendant said he wanted to leave and the officer [essentially] told him to stay was not a seizure. United States v. White, 670 F. Supp. 2d 462 (W.D. Va. 2009)*:

It appears that the Defendant argues the Continued Encounter constituted a seizure when the following exchange took place.

Defendant: Can I go home, please … man, I’m tired.

Officer: … yeah, just a second. I have to make sure you’re not wanted.

Defendant. Oh yeah … got a job … no warrants … graduated high school and everything

This exchange poses a closer question than the Initial Encounter, but it too falls short of a seizure. Contrary to Defendant’s assertion that “Dean denied permission, saying that before he would allow White to leave he would ‘have to make sure you’re not wanted,'” Defendant’s Memorandum, at 12 (emphasis added), Dean’s response could also be taken to mean that, “yeah,” the Defendant could go home, but the Officer requested “just a second” of the Defendant’s time “to make sure [he was] not wanted.”

Defendant was found to have consented to a search of his car after he was validly stopped for speeding and overtinted windows. United States v. Dumervil, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106819 (S.D. Fla. October 15, 2009).*

The government showed at hearing that the grand jury subpoenas for records had an independent basis from the alleged illegal search. United States v. Orozco, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107362 (D. Colo. November 3, 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.