CA11: Extorting sex from a minor justified exigent circumstances letter to ISP for information

An exigent circumstances letter to an ISP for information about defendant who was attempting to extort sex from minors was not unreasonable. United States v. Beckett, 369 Fed. Appx. 52 (11th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).

It was reasonable to ask a passenger for her identification when seeking an alternative driver for the car. State v. Flores, 2009 N.M. LEXIS 792 (May 26, 2009):

P20 We conclude that asking Defendant for her identification and running a warrants check on her was reasonably related to the initial justification for the stop and to the developing events that had resulted from it. Putting the car into the care of a lawfully licensed and capable driver would not only avoid the trouble and expense to its owner of a towing and impoundment, it would result in allowing all passengers to proceed on their journey more rapidly than if the car were towed and impounded. There was no impermissible prolongation of the stop. There was no evidence that Defendant was ever deprived of her freedom of movement in any respect, other than the fact that the car in which she was riding already had been lawfully stopped because of the conduct of its driver.

The Coast Guard had reasonable suspicion to search a boat that it stopped for a safety violation from the operator’s refusal to acknowledge blue lights or stop. United States v. Ferreira, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22144 (S.D. Fla. February 25, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.