CA5: Fleeing man seen inside after a consent entry justified protective sweep

Officers entered by consent when a man arrested outside requested clothes before going with them. Once inside, this defendant fled, and that justified a protective sweep. The police already suspected somebody might be inside who was wanted for murder. United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2010).*

Officer responded to a 911 call about a possible domestic beating in a house. When he arrived, he tried to talk to all the participants, and he entered without a warrant because of the obvious tenseness of the situation. The entry was with exigent circumstances. Schreiber v. Moe, 596 F.3d 323, 2010 FED App. 0062P (6th Cir. 2010).*

Defendant was arrested as an internet traveler for sex with a minor, and his car could be inventoried because it was seized pursuant to policy when defendant, an out-of-towner, was arrested. United States v. Wright, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19676 (E.D. Tenn. February 5, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.