IN: Fire scene search violated state constitution; fireman trained in meth lab detection invited officer in

Officers invited into the scene of a fire, minutes after it was put out, because one firefighter was trained in meth lab detection and reported an apparent meth lab to the police, violated the Indiana constitution. State v. Peters, 921 N.E.2d 861 (Ind. App. 2010).*

Police officers saw a vehicle recently involved in an armed robbery and suspected of being involved in others. Officers surrounded the house, and took a man outside. Defendant’s wife then consented to a search. The search was not subject to suppression because he was not removed to avoid his consent. Burke v. State, 302 Ga. App. 469 (2010).*

Minor deviation from departmental policy on conducting roadblocks did not make the roadblock unreasonable. The part not adhered to was for the safety of the officers. Field v. State, 28 So. 3d 697 (Miss. App. 2010).

Hand-to-hand transaction between a passenger in a car and a person who walked up to it was reasonable suspicion. State v. Long, 303 S.W.3d 198 (Mo. App. 2010).*

Defense counsel could not be ineffective for not filing a meritless motion to suppress. It was litigated on another ground and lost, and defendant argued that another ground would have worked, but it wouldn’t. Commonwealth v. Franklin, 2010 PA Super 24, 990 A.2d 795 (2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.