KS: Officers watching a school search did not make it a law enforcement search

Officers’ merely standing by as school official told defendant to empty his pockets was not a police search. The school official had reasonable suspicion that defendant was stoned at school. State v. Burdette, 43 Kan. App. 2d 320, 225 P.3d 736 (2010). The court’s introductory paragraph:

This is an appeal by a student convicted of having marijuana in his pockets while he was at school. Two sheriff’s deputies were in the room when an acting principal asked Jordan Kelly Burdette to empty his pockets. In Burdette’s view, this turned a search by school authorities into a law enforcement search. Since law enforcement searches need probable cause and there was no probable cause here, Burdette claims the district court should have suppressed the marijuana produced from his pockets. Because, other than their presence, there was no real involvement of law enforcement officers in asking Burdette to empty his pockets, we hold this search was not a law enforcement search needing probable cause. The record reveals this search was justified from its inception because of Burdette’s abnormal behavior; it was reasonable in scope and not excessively intrusive. We affirm Burdett’s convictions of possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia.

The facts found support the conclusion that defendant committed a traffic violation and that he consented to a search of the car. United States v. Branch, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3341 (5th Cir. February 19, 2010) (unpublished).*

The facts found support the conclusion that defendant committed a traffic violation and that the officer had reasonable suspicion to patdown the defendant, finding a weapon. United States v. Carter, 366 Fed. Appx. 136 (11th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.