CO: Consent taking of DNA did not require notice it would be used in another investigation

Defendant’s consent to taking DNA for identification is not involuntary merely because the defendant is not informed that the identification will be used in other investigations. Defendant’s sample was taken in Missouri and was a cold case hit to a case in Colorado. People v. Collins, 250 P.3d 668 (Colo. App. 2010), cert. denied 2010 Colo. LEXIS 825
(Colo., Nov. 8, 2010).*

Defendant’s stop by the officer was justified because he was the first nervous looking black male he saw responding to the scene of an alleged fight involving black males. State v. Addai, 2010 ND 29, 2010 N.D. LEXIS 24 (February 17, 2010).*

Defendant alleged his search was invalid but presented no argument so it is waived. United States v. Aleman, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13910 (D. Minn. February 17, 2010), USMJ R&R, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14043 (D. Minn. January 8, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.