NYCo.: AOL not agent of government when it discloses user’s child porn

An Internet Service Provider (ISP) is not a government agent when it provides information about an Internet user’s child pornography that it discovers which it is required to disclose under federal law. People v. Eames, 3274/2009 (Supreme Court, New York Co. February 3, 2010):

AOL is a private entity required by federal law to notify NCMEC if it detects the use of its service in violation of federal law prohibiting the possession and/or transmission of child pornography. 18 U.S.C. 2258A (formerly 42 U.S.C.A. 13032). The federal statute does not require AOL, or any other internet provider, to monitor their subscribers’ transmissions or to search their content. It is only required to notify NCMEC if it detects such materials. United States v. Richardson, supra; United States v. Jarrett, supra; Jarrett v. Commonwealth, supra; Florida v. Woldridge, supra.

The burden is on the defendant to demonstrate that an individual or an entity is an agent of government. People v. Cardona, 41 NY2d 333; People v. Snickles, 206 AD2d 675, lv denied 84 NY2d 872. To meet that burden the defendant would be required to demonstrate, for example that the government knew of or directed AOL to monitor its users, or that AOL monitored its users for government purposes. See, United States v. Jarrett, supra; Jarrett v. Commonwealth, supra; Florida v. Woldridge, supra. The defendant’s mere assertion that AOL is an arm of law enforcement does not satisfy that burden.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.