CO: Consent to “look in” the trunk is a general consent, and an unlocked backpack could be opened

The driver in control of a vehicle has the power to consent to a search of the vehicle even if he is not the registered owner and the registered owner is present at the time. A general consent to search a vehicle extends to all objectively reasonable places in which the implied object of the search may be found, and that includes closed containers so long as no forcible destruction of property is necessary to access its contents. People v. Minor, 222 P.3d 952 (Colo. 2010).

Plaintiff’s decedent was robbing a store and had employees hostage. Through an open telephone line, the police heard threats to kill for money, and they had the place surrounded. The officers believed they saw muzzle flash inside. The robbers came out and made a run for it and were shot. Gilbert’s alleged attempt to stop and surrender was not clear enough to defeat summary judgment for excessive force in killing him fleeing from the robbery scene. Gilbert v. French, 364 Fed. Appx. 76 (5th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

Knock-and-talk entry was not shown to be without consent. Defendant’s cursory argument that a protective sweep could not occur in the face of facts showing reason to do so was insufficient. United States v. McKinney, 363 Fed. Appx. 665 (10th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.