D.Kan.: Overnight babysitter had apparent aurthority to permit police entry

An adult in charge of children in the house had the authority to permit the police to at least enter the premises. Her contradictory testimony about the police entry and what she understood was rejected. United States v. Geartz, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59663 (D. Kan. July 13, 2009):

She either had been or was going to be the sole responsible adult in a house with children for a significant period of time because she suggested that the regular occupants of the house had gone to Kansas City. This suggests that she had broad access, at the very least, to the children’s room and the common areas of the residence. When she left the house, she took the children with her, indicating that she had wide responsibilities and trust as a caretaker. Finally, Ms. Ridley appears to be the mother-in-law of defendant Geartz, and this relationship suggests that she had broader control over the residence than, for instance, a babysitter who was unrelated to defendant Geartz.

The checkpoint in this case was properly set up and valid. Defendant pulled into a driveway of a vacant house and turned off his lights, and the officer could consider that suspicious enough to approach the defendant to talk to him. United States v. Hall, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59699 (M.D. Ala. July 14, 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.