OH8: Obvious trial strategy was to deny ownership of bag, so defense counsel not ineffective for not embracing it and moving to suppress

Defense trial strategy was to deny ownership of a bag defendant claimed he found, which was consistent with defendant’s denials. Therefore, it was logical to not file a motion to suppress and rely on lack of ownership, so no IAC. State v. Davis, 2009 Ohio 2881, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 2418 (8th Dist. June 18, 2009).*

A 24 minute detention on RS was reasonable before a dog sniff. State v. Graham, 2009 Ohio 2814, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 2394 (12th Dist. June 15, 2009).*

Defense counsel could not be ineffective for not raising a meritless search and seizure issue. Sias v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51521 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2009).*

The court credits the officers’ testimony that the defendant consented to a search of his house. United States v. Jones, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51543 (E.D. Pa. June 12, 2009)*; United States v. Hynson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51574 (E.D. Pa. June 11, 2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.