CA7 affirms conviction for civil rights violation for racially motived searches by off-duty officers

Defendant who went on a high speed chase for 20 miles and then got out of the car and ran on foot never submitted to the officers’ show of authority. Defendant was finally caught up with as he was trying to break into a building in flight. United States v. Johnson, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47365 (E.D. Pa. June 4, 2009).*

A probation search could not be based on an unlawful stop and nervousness observed from that, because nervousness alone is not reasonable suspicion. Adkins v. State, 298 Ga. App. 229, 679 S.E.2d 793 (2009).*

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the conviction of off-duty Milwaukee police officers for violation of civil rights for unreasonable searches and seizures and excessive searches as a result of a racially motivated melee from 2004. United States v. Bartlett, 567 F.3d 901 (7th Cir. 2009).

Police had an anonymous tip that a man “possibly” had a gun. That was an insufficient basis for a stop and frisk even in a high crime area. State v. Davis, 2009 Ohio 2538, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 2136 (2d Dist. May 29, 2009):

[*P19] Because no information was presented at the suppression hearing about the identity of the person who provided the tip that led to the search of Davis and the car, the trial court could not presume any pattern of past reliability on the part of the tipster. According to the testimony, the deputies did not verify any of the information provided in the telephone call. Although Davis did match the general description given by the caller, the state failed to present evidence that the source had any reliable knowledge of criminal activity. Neither the high level of criminal activity in the area nor the observation that Davis placed something in the glove compartment justified the search in the absence of any other reliability indicia of criminal activity.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.