OH7: Search incident of purse after handcuffing valid

Probable cause was shown, but even if it wasn’t, it was close enough for the good faith exception to apply. United States v. Garcia, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23192 (E.D. Wash. March 10, 2009):

Moreover, even if the search warrant lacked probable cause, the officers executing the search warrant were entitled to rely, in good faith, on the search warrant. See United States v. Crews, 502 F.3d 1130, 1136 (9th Cir. 2007). For the good faith reliance exception to apply, the officers must have relied on the search warrant in an objectively reasonable manner. Id. The affidavit “must establish at least a colorable argument for probable cause” for the exception to apply.” Id.

There are four circumstances in which the good faith exception does not apply because reliance is per se unreasonable: …

Defendant had been arrested and handcuffed, and her purse was seized and validly searched incident to her arrest. State v. Schwab, 2009 Ohio 1312, 2009 Ohio App. LEXIS 1108 (7th Dist. March 19, 2009)* (“[*P22] A review of the foregoing case law demonstrates that the “search incident to arrest” exception has been broadly interpreted to insulate searches conducted after the defendant has been arrested from constitutional challenge. Appellant has failed to distinguish the facts of the case sub judice from the facts in the foregoing cases.”).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.