All Writs Act permits court order for fingerprints

Officers received an anonymous report of drug dealing on a city street, and they responded. They got inside to talk to defendant about it and ran warrants on him. The stop and entry were all without reasonable suspicion and suppressed. People v. Martinez, 200 P.3d 1053 (Colo. 2009).*

Plaintiff who was detained under an order to serve 135 day sentence was lawfully detained, and fingerprinting and processing did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Wormley v. United States, 601 F. Supp. 2d 27 (D. D.C. 2009).*

The All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, permits the government to seek fingerprints from the defendant, and probable cause is not required, although it is present. United States v. Davis, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13965 (N.D. Ind. February 20, 2009).*

Defendant’s crossing the fog line while being followed justified the stop. The dog sniff was reasonable within the time of a normal stop. United States v. Carrasco-Ruiz, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107394 (D. S.D. August 8, 2008).*

Defendant failed to show that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a common hallway of an apartment building. Officers were there to arrest him, and they knocked on the apartment door without announcing their presence, which was reasonable under the circumstances because of the risk of use of a gun. The officers’ plain view when the door was opened was reasonable. United States v. Bedell, 311 Fed. Appx. 461 (2d Cir. 2009) (unpublished).*

Search incident of a car for driving on a suspended license, the stop for failing to dim lights, was valid. State v. Davison, 41 Kan. App. 2d 140, 202 P.3d 44 (2009).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.