E.D. Va.: Stop of a car on a road at the edge of an otherwise closed military base justified by the closed nature of the whole base

Defendant’s stop on a road on the edge of Quantico Marine Base was justified because Quantico is a closed military base as a whole, even though this particular road would seem not to be. United States v. Guajardo, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11410 (E.D. Va. February 17, 2009)*:

In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit specifically found Quantico to be a closed military base. United States v. Tate, 129 F.3d 118, 1997 WL 693049, *1 (4th Cir. Oct. 29, 1997)(“The question we must decide in this appeal is whether MCB Quantico is a closed military base. We find that it is.”) In the decision, the Court noted several factors indicating that Quantico is a closed installation. For example, the base houses a helicopter squadron that provides support for the President of the United States, and also serves as headquarters for the Marine Corps’ Systems Command. Id. Indeed, every Marine Corps officer, as well as many high-ranking foreign military officers, receive training at Quantico. Id. Additionally, signs posted at every gate state that the base is closed and warn that all persons and vehicles entering the base are subject to search. Id. Thus, Quantico is a closed military base, even despite the fact that Fuller Road, upon which defendant was traveling when he was stopped, is open to public use for vehicular traffic. See United States v. Daniels, 471 F.Supp.2d 634, 638-39 (E.D. Va. 2007) (noting that signage located at Quantico gates indicates that entry onto the base is deemed consent to a search).

Defendant was not stopped when he got out of his car. His furtive movements justified a “protective sweep” of the car for a weapon. United States v. Walker, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11264 (E.D. Va. February 13, 2009)*:

In the present case, Officer Gohlke’s knock on the window and Walker’s exit of the vehicle do not constitute a stop. The officers did not ask or demand that Walker exit the vehicle; he did so voluntarily. There is no evidence that the officers had their guns drawn, were especially hostile to Walker, blocked his car from leaving, or physically touched Walker. Furthermore, the officers were tasked with investigating trespassing on the premises–as required by the ownership–therefore the questions regarding Walker’s residence were justified. Accordingly, the knock on the window and Walker’s voluntary exit did not require any reasonable articulable suspicion because a reasonable person would have known he was free to leave–therefore it was not a stop.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.