TX: Handcuffing permitted under Terry; not per se an arrest

Defendant’s handcuffing was not per se an arrest. The trial court erred in so concluding. State v. Sheppard, 271 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008):

Indeed, appellee was not free to leave at that point; he was being temporarily detained while Officer Smith conducted his investigation. That is precisely what Terry permits-a temporary detention, in which the person is not free to leave, while the police officer investigates whether a crime has been committed. But a Fourth Amendment Terry detention is not a custodial arrest, and the use of handcuffs does not automatically convert a temporary detention into a Fourth Amendment arrest. As Professor LaFave explains, handcuffing a person who has been temporarily detained “is not ordinarily proper, but yet may be resorted to in special circumstances, such as when to thwart the suspect’s attempt to ‘frustrate further inquiry.'”

Defendant was stopped and arrested for custodial traffic offenses, so his vehicle could be searched incident to that arrest, and the question of consent does not have to be resolved. United States v. Gray, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99995 (N.D. Ill. December 11, 2008).*

Call from CI to defendant that officer was listening to setting up drug deal was PC when the defendant showed up. United States v. Diaz-Delgado, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100427 (S.D. Cal. December 10, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.