CA3: Technical violation of DEA inventory policy did not justify suppression

A technical violation of the DEA’s inventory policy did not justify suppression. United States v. Adames, 304 Fed. Appx. 129 (3d Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

Knock and talk led to consent. United States v. Lowry, 315 Fed. Appx. 214 (11th Cir. 2008)* (unpublished).

Officers had PC to believe that there was marijuana in one truck and the vehicle driving along with it was a conspirator. United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 550 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.