CA4: Finding gun justified protective search of car for others

Knowledge that defendant had a gun in the car justified a protective search of the car for more, which turned up more. United States v. Carico, 311 Fed. Appx. 572 (4th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

Defendants’ slow lane change was not a violation of Tennessee law, so the traffic stop that led to alleged consent was without probable cause. United States v. Gross, 550 F.3d 578, 2008 FED App. 0454P (6th Cir. 2008).*

IRS summons appeal was wholly frivolous, based on name being in capital letters and his “special appearance” exempting him from participating in the case. Ford v. Pryor, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25760 (10th Cir. December 19, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.