Single room occupancy buildings are not a closely regulated industry

Single room occupancy buildings are not a closely regulated industry to which the city can continually enter under an administrative search exception. San Joaquin Motel & Hotel Propery Owners Ass’n v. City of Stockton, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91766 (E.D. Cal. June 18, 2008).*

A motion to suppress establishes a defendant’s claim that he is an aggrieved party of the search at issue, and the state does not have to prove that. People v. Jorlantin, 2008 Colo. LEXIS 1002 (November 10, 2008).*

Brooks v. State, 292 Ga. App. 445, 664 S.E.2d 827 (2008), posted here, had state cert granted, Brooks v. State, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 95 (November 3, 2008):

This Court is particularly concerned with the following issue or issues:

Whether the State must demonstrate “reasonable grounds” to justify a search or seizure despite the existence of a validly imposed condition of probation or parole that prospectively waived the probationer or parolee’s Fourth Amendment rights.

If so, whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that under the facts of this case, the police had “reasonable grounds” to conduct the search.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.