N.D.Ill.: QI granted city for seizure of liquor license under IL law after a bar erupted into a large fight

Plaintiff ran a bar in the Chicago suburbs, and police got 911 calls about a large fight inside. When they arrived and sorted it out, the Mayor, under the authority of the Illinois liquor control law, ordered the liquor license seized for the evening. Liquor licenses are pervasively regulated, and this unilateral seizure was authorized by Illinois law. “The Court declines to venture any further into this thicket. The obvious ambiguities here cry out for the application of qualified immunity, which ‘protects police officers who reasonably interpret an unclear statute.’ … The Court’s ‘inquiry is aimed at determining whether a reasonable person in the officer’s position would have understood his actions to be against the law at the time he acted,’ … and a reasonable officer in Lacey’s position could have easily concluded, given the obvious threats to the Village’s welfare posed by Lilah’s on the morning of March 15, 2015, that they were empowered to seize the License under the Act.” Lilah’s, Inc. v. Lacey, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48801 (N.D. Ill. March 31, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.