Government showed independent source excusing warrantless entry

While there was an exigentless entry into defendant’s apartment finding child pornography, the government showed that it had an independent source and would have obtained a search warrant. Alternatively, the government showed inevitable discovery. United States v. Bonczek, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87436 (S.D. N.Y. October 16, 2008)*:

The Government has met its burden to show that the NYPD would have obtained a warrant even without the information confirmed by the illegal entry. Sergeant Minca knew he had a viable complaint from Mr. Vega when he asked Detective Ryan to come into Manhattan from his home in Orange County, 55 miles away, in order to obtain a search warrant. Indeed, that was Sergeant Minca’s sole purpose in calling Detective Ryan into work. He did not need Detective Ryan to look at the computer screen. Both Sergeant Minca and Detective Ryan recognized the need to obtain a warrant and took a step toward obtaining one by calling the Manhattan District Attorney’s office before entering Mr. Bonczek’s apartment. Accordingly, the Court finds that the Government has satisfied both elements of the independent source doctrine and that the evidence seized from Mr. Bonczek’s apartment is not subject to the exclusionary rule.

Defendant was surrounded by police, but it was not so coercive that it was involuntary. United States v. Haeuser, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87246 (E.D. Wis. October 17, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.