Drug dealers keep their stuff at home, so that’s nexus

It is likely that a drug dealer will keep drugs in his house, so that gives nexus. United States v. Burton, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86680 (E.D. Pa. October 27, 2008)*:

In drug-related cases, numerous courts of appeals have held evidence of drug crimes is likely to be found in drug dealers’ residences. See Whitner, 219 F.3d at 298 (citing cases in accord from the United States Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, and District of Columbia Circuits). The Third Circuit reasoned “evidence associated with drug dealing needs to be stored somewhere, and … a dealer will have the opportunity to conceal it in his home.” Id. at 297. In Whitner, the defendant was evasive about where he lived, leading to a “reasonable inference [he] was attempting to conceal the existence of the apartment and his association with the apartment. This attempt at concealment when combined with the other information … set forth in [the] affidavit logically suggests [the defendant] was storing some evidence of illegal activity at the apartment.” Id. at 299.

Jacket was a place where drugs could have been kept, so it could be searched under a search warrant. United States v. Deas, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86725 (D. Conn. October 27, 2008).*

Fact defendant had been previously arrested by the officer was a factor in whether he was free to leave when he was being talked to by the officer. He was singled out of a group of five to be talked to. United States v. Williams, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86910 (S.D. Ohio October 27, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.