S.D. Ohio: Officer’s excuse for stop and search not supported by the evidence

Search of defendant’s car was preceded by a request for consent that was refused, then the officers said that they smelled marijuana, so they searched. They didn’t find marijuana, but instead a gun. The search is suppressed for lack of justification. The video of the stop did not support the officers’ version. United States v. Pearson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86304 (S.D. Ohio September 10, 2008):

It follows that because the Officers conceded that they were not in fear for their safety and that the marijuana odor was the sole justification for their search of Defendant and his vehicle, there existed no independent cause for the search. While the initial stop may have been legitimate, the Court does not find that something occurred during the traffic stop which generated the necessary reasonable suspicion to justify the search of Defendant’s person and vehicle. Perez, 440 F.3d at 370.

Two 911 calls were received, the first anonymous, the second not, about an ongoing altercation. The police arrived and corroborated what they were told in the 911 calls, and this gave the officers cause to search defendant’s car for a weapon. United States v. Whitaker, 546 F.3d 902 (7th Cir. 2008).*

Plaintiffs sufficiently alleged that they were unreasonably subjected to unreasonable group strip searches to survive a motion to dismiss. Streeter v. Sheriff of Cook County, 576 F. Supp. 2d 913 (N.D. Ill. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.