Fact another local judge found no PC did not mean the first judge issuing the warrant was wrong

The fact a different judge in the District of Columbia later drew a different conclusion on whether probable existed after the search occurred did not mean that there was not probable cause when the warrant issued. Here, the D.C. Cir. concludes that there was PC, and the good faith exception would save the warrant in any event. United States v. Spencer, 530 F.3d 1003 (D.C. Cir. 2008).*

The search here produced evidence that linked defendant to a bank robbery, and it was consented to by a person with apparent authority. Even it it wasn’t valid, it was harmless here because it produced some of the money and was not the fact that caused defendant’s conviction. United States v. Turner, 287 Fed. Appx. 426, 2008 FED App. 0409N (6th Cir. 2008)* (unpublished).*

“The district court did not err, much less plainly err, by finding that probable cause existed for the traffic stop.” United States v. Garcia, 284 Fed. Appx. 791 (11th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.