IN voter photo ID law does not violate (inter alia) the Fourth Amendment

TRO denied on use of Indiana voter photo ID law. Terry has no application here. Stewart v. Marion County, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84817 (S.D. Ind. October 21, 2008):

Plaintiff next argues that the Voter ID Law violates his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiff claims that he cannot be asked for identification in the absence of probable cause that would support a warrant. However, Plaintiff cites only Terry stop case law to support his assertion. Plaintiff does not cite a single case that holds poll workers must have probable cause before they can require the voter to produce valid photographic identification. The Court concludes that the case law Plaintiff cites is not relevant to whether the State of Indiana may require voters to present valid photographic identification. Therefore, Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits.

Entry into plaintiffs’ home looking for another who also lived there and named in a bench warrant resulted in summary judgment for the defendants. They received a call from a CI that he was there, and they saw his car there when they arrived. Merring v. City of Carbondale, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84989 (M.D. Pa. October 22, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.