Use of SWAT team to execute drug warrant was reasonable

Use of 20 SWAT officers and 3 K-9 officers to execute a search warrant was reasonable for purposes of civil liability. Walker v. City of Wilmington, 579 F. Supp. 2d 563 (D. Del. 2008):

Based on the record, the court holds that defendants’ use of force was objectively reasonable under the circumstances. The employment of a 20-member SWAT team was objectively reasonable because, as the police had learned from surveillance, 118 Dutton Drive had multiple floors to cover and multiple occupants to detain. (D.I. 51 at 56) Using K9 officers was objectively reasonable because police believed suspect Walker to be preparing to flee. (D.I. 46 at 169) Using weapons was objectively reasonable because suspect Walker [*26] was wanted for murder, had a criminal history, and was believed to be armed with at least a knife; police did not know whether the other occupants had weapons.

Defendant’s claim of consent by trickery was not presented to the district court, so it was waived. United States v. Vanvliet, 542 F.3d 259 (1st Cir. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.