Utah probation searches are constitutional

Utah probation search was based on reasonable suspicion and was constitutional. United States v. Stewart, 273 Fed. Appx. 768 (10th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

Unusual travel plans, while not completely implausible, were implausible enough for reasonable suspicion. United States v. Gonzalez, 290 Fed. Appx. 80 (10th Cir. 2008) (unpublished).*

Asking a motorist if the officer can ask more questions before the driver leaves is not unconstitutional. “Here, it is clear that Kirkland was informed that he was free to leave and then voluntarily consented to further questioning. As noted above, Rogers asked, ‘Mr. Kirkland, before you go, do you mind if I ask you a couple questions?’ to which Kirkland replied, ‘Go ahead.’ Review of the DVD clearly shows that Kirkland was cooperative and did not object to further conversation.” United States v. Kirkland, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30670 (S.D. Ill. April 15, 2008).*

Even if defendant’s search and the seizure of some guns was illegal, he wasn’t prejudiced by it because plenty of other guns that were lawfully seized came in anyway. Montgomery v. United States, 557 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Fla. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.