N.D. Ill. declines to sanction knock-and-talk where 7th Cir. hasn’t already

The back deck of defendant’s home was within the curtilage under the Dunn factors even though defendant’s property backed up to a golf course that enabled officers to walk right up to the back fenceline. The court also finds that the officers could not even see inside the house from the back deck as they said they did. Also, the Seventh Circuit has not yet recognized knock-and-talk, so the court declines to do so here. United States v. Conrad, 578 F. Supp. 2d 1016 (N.D. Ill. 2008).*

A IAC claim of failure to advise a defendant of the possibility of a conditional plea to preserve a suppression issue is cognizable in a § 2255. He still, however, has to prove a failure of performance and prejudice, and here he cannot. United States v. Cedeno, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73411 (M.D. Pa. September 25, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.