GA: Plain feel did not support seizure from defendant’s pocket

Object in defendant’s pocket felt during a frisk was not immediately perceived as a weapon, so going in after it was not reasonable. Brown v. State, 293 Ga. App. 564, 667 S.E.2d 410 (2008)*:

The record shows that Bohannon lacked authority to intrude into Brown’s pocket. We recognize that, while patting down the outside of that pocket, Bohannon detected the corner of a hard object. Nothing indicates, however, that the object felt like a gun or other weapon. On the contrary, Bohannon did not know what it was and decided to investigate further based only on the broad assumption that “anything can house a weapon.” Moreover, when questioned at the suppression hearing, Bohannon pointed to no particularized facts that reasonably led him to believe that Brown might have a weapon. Although Bohannon was suspicious that no one knew Brown, he did not believe that Brown had committed a crime and was prepared to let Brown walk away from the scene.

Defendant’s claim that he was subjected to an illegal warrantless arrest without probable cause so his DNA was improperly obtained on his arrest was not presented to the trial court so it is waived. He raised a Sixth Amendment claim against his arrest, not probable cause. State v. Foreman, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 353 (September 16, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.