E.D. Mich: Civil discovery requests do not implicate Fourth Amendment

Civil discovery requests do not implicate the Fourth Amendment.
Flagg v. City of Detroit, 252 F.R.D. 346 (E.D. Mich. 2008):

[T]he discovery efforts of the private Plaintiff do not implicate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. See United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109, 113, 104 S. Ct. 1652, 1656 (1984) (confirming that the Fourth Amendment “proscrib[es] only governmental action,” and does not apply to searches conducted by private individuals); see also United States v. International Business Machines Corp., 83 F.R.D. 97, 102 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) (“It strains common sense and constitutional analysis to conclude that the fourth amendment was meant to protect against unreasonable discovery demands made by a private litigant in the course of civil litigation.”).

Comment: What happens when a court is determining whether to enforce the discovery demand?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.