NE: Field sobriety test must be based on reasonable suspicion

A traffic stop is probable cause for the stop, but reasonable suspicion of being under the influence is required for a field sobriety test. State v. Royer, 276 Neb. 173, 753 N.W.2d 333 (2008):

[F]ield sobriety tests may be justified by a police officer’s reasonable suspicion based upon specific articulable facts that the driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. In determining the reasonableness of a search for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, the court balances the intrusion upon an individual’s privacy with the need to promote governmental interests. See State v. McKinney, 273 Neb. 346, 730 N.W.2d 74 (2007). State v. McKinney, supra, set out the balancing test for determining the reasonableness of a search, and other courts have applied a similar test to determine the reasonableness of a field sobriety test.

Defendant’s wearing a down jacket with a hole in it that could have concealed a gun when the jacket was inappropriate for the weather was a strong factor in reasonable suspicion. State v. DelValle, 109 Conn. App. 143, 950 A.2d 603 (2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.