A typo in the address from including an address from a prior warrant at the end but where the correct address was at the time was hardly prejudicial. If the latter address had been searched, that would be really important, but defendant wasn’t prejudiced here. United States v. Rivera, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64851 (W.D.N.Y. May 17, 2016).
Officers lawfully entered the door of defendant’s hotel room to arrest him because he didn’t fully come out. A protective sweep was permissible because they factually had at least reasonable suspicion to believe that was another person inside. United States v. Cervino-Hernandez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65410 (D.Neb. April 28, 2016).*