OR: Viewing videotapes privately seized required a warrant

Restaurant manager charged with video voyeurism for surreptitiously recording women in the bathroom based on employees violating rules and looking at the TV in the restaurant kitchen discovering one tape. They turned over that and other tapes to the police who viewed them without a warrant. The warrantless viewing of the videotapes violated the defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy under Oregon law. State v. Luman, 220 Ore. App. 617 (2008), but reversed State v. Luman, 347 Ore. 487, 223 P.3d 1041 (2009).

Defendant passenger in a car driven by a driver suspected to be under the influence of meth was detained when his driver’s license was put in the police car. He ultimately had his backpack searched, and it was not “unattenuated” from the initial detention. State v. Ayles, 220 Ore. App. 606 (2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.