GA: Unlawful entry and ordering defendant out of shower at gunpoint tainted consent

Unlawful entry into defendant’s hotel room and getting him out of the shower at gunpoint did not make his consent voluntary. Snider v. State, 108 Conn. App. 533 (June 24, 2008):

When a consent to search follows an illegal entry, we examine the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the consent was voluntary because it was obtained by means sufficiently attenuated or distinguishable from the illegality to be purged of any taint, or whether the consent was invalid because it was the product of and tainted by the illegality. … Here, the officers illegally entered the hotel room, ordered Snider out of the shower at gunpoint, and immediately obtained his consent to search his clothes as he stood before the officers wrapped in a towel. Under these circumstances, we find that Snider’s consent to search the clothes was invalid because it was the product of and tainted by the illegal entry. … Snider’s subsequent consent to the search of his luggage, given immediately after the first consent search and after he was placed under arrest, was also invalid for the same reasons.

Search incident is proper under Belton even when defendant is handcuffed and in the backseat of a police car. State v. Garcia, 108 Conn. App. 533, 949 A.2d 499 (2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.