No differing inventory search standard for private tow company taking possession of vehicle at request of police

There is no reason for a different standard between inventories where the police take possession or a private towing company does at the request of the police. State v. Whealton, 108 Conn. App. 172, 947 A.2d 965 (2008):

Here, the court credited Redd’s testimony that the officers conducted the inventory search pursuant to standard procedure when the vehicle was going to be impounded. The defendant has not provided this court with any legal basis for distinguishing between a situation in which the police take a vehicle into police custody or turn it over to a private towing company for impounding. In both cases, the protective reasons for an inventory search pertain.

Worker’s compensation investigation by USPS of an employee working in his yard hardly violated any Fourth Amendment right. Gaber v. Henderson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43018 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2008).*

In a third party consent case, the fact the third party was not involved in any illegal activities is a reason for their consent to be voluntary. United States v. Wahl, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43138 (N.D. Fla. May 30, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.