Interloper’s false assertion of authority over duffel bag was sufficient for apparent authority

One person’s assertion of control over a duffel bag created apparent authority to search it, even though they didn’t have authority. United States v. Purcell, 526 F.3d 953, 2008 FED App. 0202P (6th Cir. 2008):

In the case at hand, when the agents began their search of the luggage in the hotel room, they had a good-faith basis to believe that Crist had authority to consent. Crist asserted that the duffel bag that yielded the marijuana was hers, and her purse was sitting on top of the duffel bag. Crist’s statements created apparent authority for the officers, and their search of the duffel bag was justified because they acted in good-faith reliance upon Crist’s assertions. Purcell acknowledges in his brief that the officers reasonably relied upon Crist’s assertion of authority over the duffel bag.

Reasonable suspicion that all occupants of a vehicle were involved in carrying contraband justified extending the stop. This was not mere propinquity to somebody else for which there was reasonable suspicion, a different situation. United States v. Rivera, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41613 (D. Conn. May 27, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.