Paying rent does not necessarily convert “common authority” into landlord-tenant relationship

Defendant stayed in the house of another person and he paid rent of $100 a month. While a landlord cannot consent to a search of a tenant under Chapman, this was not a traditional landlord-tenant relationship, and he let the other person have entry into his room when he was not there. Therefore, this was a case of common authority under Matlock. United States v. Thompson, 524 F.3d 1126 (10th Cir. 2008).

Receiving permission to drive a rental car from a person who himself was an authorized driver under the rental contract confers no standing on the driver. United States v. Aispuro, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36306 (N.D. Ill. May 2, 2008).*

Defendant secreted personal property on somebody else’s property, so he had no reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Smith, 983 So. 2d 65 (La. 2008):

Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant’s consent to search his home and vehicle did not encompass personal effects located elsewhere on or off his property, defendant surrendered any reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of the closed and locked bag containing precursor materials for the clandestine production of methamphetamine by concealing the bag, wrapped inside a plastic garbage bag, in the woods on land belonging to someone else and accessed by an unfenced footpath at the back of his own property, apparently without the knowledge and consent of his neighbor. [citations omitted]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.