Asking driver names of passengers and then asking passengers during a traffic stop was not unreasonable

During a traffic stop, the officer did not act unreasonably in asking the names of the passengers and then separately asking the passengers their names. After that, the driver consented to a search of the car, and each of the persons in the car consented to a patdown. State v. Perry, 2008 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 317 (April 28, 2008).*

Affidavit for search of several residences was “bare bones” because there was almost nothing to show a nexus to them and crime. Other search warrants taking information from these searches and adding them to the master affidavit fared no better. These include taking saliva samples. As to one residence there was probable cause. United States v. Stearn, 548 F. Supp. 2d 182 (E.D. Pa. 2008).*

Officer’s search of a cardboard box did not exceed the scope of a prior private search. The officer opened a clear plastic bag, however, but its contents could already be seen, and that was not unreasonable. United States v. Oliver, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34255 (N.D. Tex. April 25, 2008).*

Plaintiff’s receipt of a citation that was not sworn to when he received it was not a Fourth Amendment violation. Amarkarian v. City of Glendale, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34268 (C.D. Cal. April 23, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.