There was RS for defendant’s stop based on victims’ robbery report

Trial court erred in suppressing stop of defendant’s vehicle on victims’ report of a robbery. State v. Green, 992 So. 2d 82 (Ala. Crim. App. 2008):

Here, it appears that the robbery occurred mere minutes before Officer Ferguson stopped Green’s vehicle. The State asserts in its brief in opposition to Green’s motion to suppress that Green’s vehicle was stopped approximately 1.3 miles from the laundromat where the robberies occurred. The 1 dispatches identified the vehicle as a gray or dark gray car with two to four black males in the vehicle. Apparently the source of the dispatches was the victims’ descriptions of the robbers to police. Officer Ferguson stopped the vehicle approximately six minutes after the BOLO was issued.

The place to be searched was described by its look and its address, so the warrant clearly satisfied particularity. The good faith exception would save it, too. United States v. Gutierrez, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27260 (N.D. Okla. April 1, 2008).* (Comment: The way this is described in the opinion, this was not even a close call. This must have been an argument made to satisfy the client.)

Federal § 1983 claims that could have been brought in a previous state action and weren’t were precluded in federal action. Zaklama v. Leanza, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27195 (D. N.J. March 31, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.