GSR testing after arrest requires no warrant

GSR testing after arrest requires no warrant. It is no different than fingerprinting. People v. Allen, 376 Ill. App. 3d 511, 875 N.E.2d 1221, 314 Ill. Dec. 934 (1st Dist. 2007).

Motion to suppress was summarily denied because the record supported the finding that defendant’s stop was not unreasonably extended and he consented. United States v. Villalovos, 249 Fed. Appx. 339 (5th Cir. 2007)* (unpublished).

Being transferred from one jail to another involves no new seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. Goldhaber v. Higgins, 576 F. Supp. 2d 694 (W.D. Pa. 2007).*

Officers were looking for a stolen air compressor, and they came upon defendant’s truck parked in front of his house visible from the road, and they suspected the air compressor was there. They approached in this public area, and saw stolen tools from that vantage point in an open shed. It was valid plain view. Tryon v. State, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 515 (September 27, 2007).*

Defendant could show no more than the informant was a mere tipster and not involved in the drug transaction as he contended. Therefore, the informant would not be disclosed. Cauley v. State, 287 Ga. App. 701,
652 S.E.2d 586 (2007).*

There was an objective basis for defendant’s traffic stop. State v. Burnette, 2007 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 770 (September 28, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.