Consent to enter to talk was exceeded by officer looking in bathroom

Consent to enter to talk to the defendant was voluntary, but an officer walking to the bathroom to look around exceeded the scope of consent. State v. Hetrick, 2008 Ohio 1455, 2008 Ohio App. LEXIS 1283 (9th Dist. March 31, 2008).

Being in a high-crime area is not reasonable suspicion. Neither is the fact a weapon was found on someone else reasonable suspicion as to the defendant. People v. Smith, 49 V.I. 229 (2008).*

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy on land outside his farm where officers found the remains of a horse. Reams v. Irvin, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25350 (N.D. Ga. March 31, 2008).*

Reasonable suspicion here included defendant’s admission that he was traveling to a known drug house that was already under investigation. United States v. Ammerman, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25460 (W.D. Mo. March 31, 2008).*

Where the use of a drug dog did not extend the defendant’s stop, he has no Fourth Amendment claim. United States v. Scott, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25184 (E.D. Ky. March 28, 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.