Internet provider information is not private (but no case has said that it is)

Subscriber information provided to an Internet provider is not constitutionally protected (and no case is to the contrary). A potential violation of ECPA is not subject to suppression. United States v. Perrine, 518 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2008).

Slight discrepancy between crime victim’s report of the color of a vehicle involved in a crime does not defeat reasonable suspicion. United States v. Abdus-Price, 518 F.3d 926 (D.C. Cir. 2008).*

Stop was justified by a traffic violation, and independent probable cause developed. United States v. Pineda, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18137 (N.D. Ga. March 10, 2008).*

Fourth Amendment civil rights claim in California was timely because it was brought within one year of dismissal of state case, but plaintiff loses on the merits. Womack v. County of Amador, 551 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (E.D. Cal. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.