Delaware approves hearing to see if CI would be called at suppression hearing because he saw the search

The defendant sufficiently showed by affidavit that the CI in this case saw the arrest and search of defendant go down, so he gets a hearing to see if the CI is a witness to the case on the validity of the search. McNair v. State, 947 A.2d 1122 (Del. 2008).

The search of defendant’s car was valid as an inventory. He was removed from the car and arrested, and handcuffed while on the ground. He was asked about whether he had a gun, and he said he did. The statement violated Miranda, but the gun comes in under the inventory exception. United States v. Campbell, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4707 (S.D. Fla. January 22, 2008).*

Officer had probable cause to believe that defendant had a gun in the car after seeing him pull one out of his waistband and conceal it in the car, and that was justification for an automobile search. State v. Hollingshead, 974 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3DCA 2008).*

An Idaho police officer had authority to require a drug test of a probationer without reasonable suspicion. Dicta: A search of his home, however, would require a probation officer to participate, but that is not an issue here. State v. Purdum, 2008 Ida. App. LEXIS 8 (January 23, 2008).*

A 14 year old properly allowed police to enter, but an older occupant signed consent to search the premises. State v. Veals, 977 So. 2d 1030 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2008), released for publication April 4, 2008.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.