Officer did not stop defendant, and the encounter turned potentially dangerous when defendant picked up a stick; patdown was justified

Defendant stopped his vehicle on his own while an officer was following, but the officer did not stop immedidately, instead making a U-turn and coming back. The officer asked the defendant if he was lost and where he was going, and defendant said he was looking for a girlfriend’s house but he couldn’t find it. He picked up a stick from the backseat, and the officer decided to do a patdown. “During the pat-down, Officer Boyle discovered a knife in appellant’s left pocket, and felt a large bulge in a plastic bag in his jacket pocket. Officer Boyle could see the bulge without taking it out of appellant’s pocket, and observed it to be a white substance that the officer believed to be cocaine. Officer Boyle then arrested appellant.” This was not a stop, and the patdown was for officer safety, and the object was determined by plain feel. State v. Potter, 2007 Ohio 4216, 2007 Ohio App. LEXIS 3815 (12th Dist. August 20, 2007).*

Inmates in a Pennsylvania prison were involved in a UCC redemption scam where liens were filed against prison officials for perceived wrongs. The prison officials conducted cell searches in the interest of prison security when it was discoverd that they\ same scam seen in New Jersey had moved to a Pennsylvania prison. The case proceeded as a due process and First Amendment claim, and the prison officials had the power to search and seize to prevent future crime, and the UCC scam qualified as a crime. Monroe v. Beard, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60432 (E.D. Pa. August 16, 2007).*

Plaintiff’s conspiracy claim about his incarceration for intimidation of him as an inmate by moving him from protective custody to general population did not state a claim. Gonzalez v. City of Fresno, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60630 (E.D. Cal. August 7, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.