Defendant showing up in an internet child predator sting justified a search incident of his vehicle

Defendant was involved in online chats with an undercover law enforcement officer, and he showed up at an assigned place for a meeting. He said he was bringing condoms. The police had probable cause to search his car incident to his arrest to look for evidence of the crime. United States v. Lanzon, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45013 (S.D. Fla. June 21, 2007).

In dealing with a clerical error that a want on a particular car had been removed from the system by the time of the stop, that led to a vehicle stop, the court should assess, first, whether the stop was reasonable, and second, what is the remedy. Here, the court found that the stop was not reasonable because the collective knowledge rationale was based on conclusions. United States v. Anderson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45137 (N.D. Ohio June 21, 2007).*

Officer admitted that he did not have reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant, but the court finds that the defendant was not stopped–it was a consensual encounter. United States v. Rogers, 491 F. Supp. 2d 530 (M.D. Pa. 2007).*

2255 petitioner never challenged the search and seizure before pleading guilty, and he was well aware of it. It is waived for post-conviction. United States v. Borer, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44872 (D. Neb. June 20, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.