D.P.R.: Older info from multi-year DTO wasn’t stale

The search warrant wasn’t stale because the affidavit set out that this was a multi-year drug trafficking organization. “The Court also factors the nature of the place to be searched into its staleness calculation. … Here, the place searched was defendants’ permanent residence, making it more likely that items would remain within the home over an extended period of time.” United States v. Arce-Lopez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18472 (D. P.R. February 11, 2014).*

Once a forfeiture of cash occurs, the owner can’t use a motion for return of seized property to get it back. Green v. State, 2014 Ark. 69, 2014 Ark. LEXIS 117 (February 13, 2014).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s vehicle, and the gun and a ring were in plain view, visible from outside. United States v. Jarrett, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18005 (W.D. Pa. February 12, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.