W.D.Ky.: Physical surveillance of a house isn’t unreasonable

The court conducted a Franks hearing, but the defendant provided nothing that was false. Also, the surveillance of his house from the neighborhood was hardly an unreasonable search. United States v. Hernandez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17052 (W.D. Ky. February 11, 2014).*

The search warrant was not stale because the application stated that the CI’s information was obtained within the previous 24 hours. Peden v. State, 2014 Miss. App. LEXIS 63 (February 11, 2014).*

The stop wasn’t complete when consent was asked for and obtained because the computer check hadn’t come back. Even if the stop was considered complete, there was reasonable suspicion defendant was involved with manufacturing methamphetamine. State v. Reed, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 125 (February 11, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.