D.Conn.: Backing out of a car and body movements suggested def was armed and warranted patdown

Even though the state trooper’s primary purpose was interdiction, there was a factual basis for stopping defendant for not having headlights on during a period of rain. Defendant’s backing out of the car and the way he held his body suggested he was armed, and that justified a patdown. United States v. Patterson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11014 (D. Conn. January 29, 2014).*

There was reasonable suspicion for detaining defendant who was walking away from the scene of a recent robbery, and he matched the description. The stop didn’t ripen into an arrest until later. United States v. Young, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10820 (D. Nev. January 17, 2014).*

Officers had multiple reports that a green Durango was involved in a shots fired incident, and that provided reason for its stop. United States v. Morris, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10567 (D. Minn. January 14, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.