WaPo; Volokh Conspiracy: When can the police pull over a car based on an anonymous tip?

WaPo; Volokh Conspiracy: When can the police pull over a car based on an anonymous tip? by Orin Kerr:

Earlier today, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Navarette v. California, a Fourth Amendment case on when the police can lawfully pull over a car based on an anonymous tip of wrongdoing. I want to offer a few thoughts on the argument, and in particular to try to explain one potential source of confusion. Unfortunately, the Court has not yet posted the oral argument transcript. All I have to go on right now are others’ reports. So I’ll offer this post for now, assuming those reports are accurate, and if necessary I’ll follow up after the transcript is available.

Longstanding Supreme Court precedent says that the police can make an investigative stop of someone if the police have reasonable suspicion, based on specific and articulable facts, that a person is engaged in or is wanted in connection with criminal activity. The question is, did this tip meet that standard, such that the police could pull over the car when they spotted the truck?

I tend to think that the answer should be that yes, it did: This specific tip was sufficient. …

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.