W.D.Tenn.: Apparently erroneously shifting burden to defendant, he can’t show seizure of house was invalid

Seemingly shifting the burden of proof (“Having failed to present any factual or legal support, Defendant’s contention is without merit.”) the seizure of defendant’s property pending obtaining a warrant was valid. United States v. Bigbee, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 694 (M.D. Tenn. January 3, 2014).*

Defendant’s claim that consent was coerced by a threat to shoot defendant’s dogs is rejected on the facts. United States v. Mason, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 866 (D. Ore. January 6, 2014).*

The stop was justified at its inception by a traffic offense and a tip, and it was not unreasonably extended. United States v. Segura, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1044 (W.D. Tex. January 6, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.