Law.com: HBO, Videographer Spared Liability for Shooting in Raid (with case link)

Law.com: HBO, Videographer Spared Liability for Shooting in Raid by Andrew Keshner:

The Second Department rejected the arguments of a woman who was injured during a raid that was filmed for a possible series or documentary. She claimed that the media defendants and police planned for excessive force during the execution of a search warrant.

Rodriguez v City of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 08609 (2d Dept. December 26, 2013):

Here, Yates and HBO established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them by demonstrating that they did not participate, either directly or indirectly, in a common plan or design to commit the allegedly tortious act that caused the plaintiff’s injuries (see Zureck by Zureck v Wheeler, 217 AD2d 545, 545-546; cf. Wilson v DiCaprio, 278 AD2d 25, 26; cf. also Vanacore v Teigue, 243 AD2d 706; Policastro v Savarese, 171 AD2d 849, 852-853). In particular, Yates and HBO demonstrated that they did not make any suggestion or recommendation as to how the police should conduct themselves during the execution of the search warrant. In addition, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the evidence submitted by Yates and HBO demonstrated that the videographer never entered the building, let alone the apartment in which the plaintiff was shot. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.